linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] clk: Add Ingenic jz4770 CGU driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1514559744.2198.1@smtp.crapouillou.net>
Date:   Fri, 29 Dec 2017 16:02:24 +0100
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] clk: Add Ingenic jz4770 CGU driver


Dear Mr. Ombredanne,

Le ven. 29 déc. 2017 à 13:55, Philippe Ombredanne 
<pombredanne@...b.com> a écrit :
> Dear Mr Crapouillou-Cercueil-Sir,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> 
> wrote:
>>  Add support for the clocks provided by the CGU in the Ingenic JZ4770
>>  SoC.
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>  --- /dev/null
>>  +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c
>>  @@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
>>  +/*
>>  + * JZ4770 SoC CGU driver
>>  + *
>>  + * Copyright 2017, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>>  + *
>>  + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or 
>> modify
>>  + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 
>> or later
>>  + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>  + */
> 
> Do you mind using a simpler one-line SPDX identifier instead of this
> fine but clearly crapouillish legalese boilerplate? Unless you are
> trying to turn the kernel in a legal compendium, of course ;)
> 
> This is documented in Thomas doc patches. This would apply to your
> entire patch set.
> Thank you for your kind consideration!

Sure, I wasn't aware about that new SPDX identifier thing. I'll do it 
in V5.

Regards,
-Paul