lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOFm3uEbEx+HTsOANchqiReuDBa96O0Y-V-igLGWPF-OxQ2jtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:55:12 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] clk: Add Ingenic jz4770 CGU driver

Dear Mr Crapouillou-Cercueil-Sir,

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:
> Add support for the clocks provided by the CGU in the Ingenic JZ4770
> SoC.

<snip>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/jz4770-cgu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
> +/*
> + * JZ4770 SoC CGU driver
> + *
> + * Copyright 2017, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 or later
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */

Do you mind using a simpler one-line SPDX identifier instead of this
fine but clearly crapouillish legalese boilerplate? Unless you are
trying to turn the kernel in a legal compendium, of course ;)

This is documented in Thomas doc patches. This would apply to your
entire patch set.
Thank you for your kind consideration!
-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ