linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: rcar: Use WAKEUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:44:07 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Niklas Soderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio: rcar: Use WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag

Hi Rafael,

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>>
>> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
>> when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the GPIO block's
>> module clock (if exists) is manually kept running during system suspend, to
>> make sure the device stays active.
>>
>> However, this explicit clock handling is merely a workaround for a failure
>> to properly communicate wakeup information to the PM core. Instead, set the
>> WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag to indicate that the device is part of the
>> wakeup path, which further also enables middle-layers and PM domains (like
>> genpd) to act on this.
>>
>> In case the device is attached to genpd and depending on if it has an
>> active wakeup configuration, genpd will keep the device active (the clock
>> running) during system suspend when needed. This enables us to remove all
>> explicit clock handling code from the driver, so let's do that as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> [Ulf: Converted to use the WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag]

Ulf: + killing the DEV_PM_OPS define, increasing kernel size if PM_SUSPEND=n?

>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c

>> @@ -415,6 +402,18 @@ static int gpio_rcar_parse_dt(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p, unsigned int *npins)
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int gpio_rcar_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +       struct gpio_rcar_priv *p = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +       dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev, p->wakeup_path ? DPM_FLAG_WAKEUP_PATH : 0);
>
> Why don't you simply set dev->power.wakeup_path here?

That's what my v1 did (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10050995/).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds