[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <151488985647.31910.13789348141231256125.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 10:44:16 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] afs: Potential uninitialized variable in afs_extract_data()
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Smatch warns that:
fs/afs/rxrpc.c:922 afs_extract_data()
error: uninitialized symbol 'remote_abort'.
Smatch is right that "remote_abort" might be uninitialized when we pass
it to afs_set_call_complete(). I don't know if that function uses the
uninitialized variable. Anyway, the comment for rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(),
says that "*_abort should also be initialised to 0." and this patch does
that.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index ea1460b9b71a..e1126659f043 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ int afs_extract_data(struct afs_call *call, void *buf, size_t count,
{
struct afs_net *net = call->net;
enum afs_call_state state;
- u32 remote_abort;
+ u32 remote_abort = 0;
int ret;
_enter("{%s,%zu},,%zu,%d",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists