linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] tpm_tis: Move ilb_base_addr to tpm_tis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180102145735.GB29208@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jan 2018 07:57:35 -0700
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     "Shaikh, Azhar" <azhar.shaikh@...el.com>
Cc:     "jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com" <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] tpm_tis: Move ilb_base_addr to tpm_tis_data

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:31:30AM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 08:05:43PM -0800, Azhar Shaikh wrote:
> >>
> >>> -	return tpm_chip_register(chip);
> >>> +	rc = tpm_chip_register(chip);
> >>> +	if (rc && is_bsw())
> >>> +		iounmap(priv->ilb_base_addr);
> >>> +
> >>> +	return rc;
> >>>  out_err:
> >>>  	tpm_tis_remove(chip);
> >>> +	if (is_bsw())
> >>> +		iounmap(priv->ilb_base_addr);
> >>> +
> >>>  	return rc;
> >>>  }
> >>
> >>I thought you were resending this to fix the above, why is is it still wonky?
> >>
> >
> >Oh! I fixed it in the second patch ("tpm: Keep CLKRUN enabled throughout
> >the duration of transmit_cmd()"). Should have fixed in this patch instead. My
> >bad, didn't see it was introduced in this patch. I thought it was part of second
> >patch. Will fix this.
> >
> 
> On checking, the ops->clk_enable is not still introduced yet. It is introduced in the second patch. The cleanup is done in the next patch.
> So do you want me to still fix this here?

Try hard to not edit your own patches in your series. No reason why
iounmap cannot be put into tpm_tis_remove in the first place

Jason