linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: sc2731: Fix defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:13:11 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Erick Chen <erick.chen@...eadtrum.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: sc2731: Fix defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: sc2731: Fix defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From fa32f7a3fedd800161ca529397da14faa6c47c67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 20:38:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: sc2731: Fix defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and
 SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE

The defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE makes
regmap_write() call looks strange because it takes reg parameter fist
then val.
Base on Erick's suggestion to define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT and
SC2731_WR_UNLOCK_VALUE instead.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Reviewed-by: Erick Chen <erick.chen@...eadtrum.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/sc2731-regulator.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/sc2731-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/sc2731-regulator.c
index 794fcd504b3d..eb2bdf060b7b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/sc2731-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/sc2731-regulator.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
 /*
  * SC2731 regulator lock register
  */
-#define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE	0xf0c
-#define SC2731_WR_UNLOCK		0x6e7f
+#define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT		0xf0c
+#define SC2731_WR_UNLOCK_VALUE		0x6e7f

 /*
  * SC2731 enable register
@@ -203,8 +203,8 @@ static struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {

 static int sc2731_regulator_unlock(struct regmap *regmap)
 {
-	return regmap_write(regmap, SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE,
-			    SC2731_WR_UNLOCK);
+	return regmap_write(regmap, SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT,
+			    SC2731_WR_UNLOCK_VALUE);
 }

 static int sc2731_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
2.15.1