lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 16:40:08 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Lars Wendler <wendler.lars@....de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION=y on x86_64 causes gcc to segfault
 when building x86_32 binaries

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Same problem with 4.15-rc6. So I suppose that means it's a general
> issue.

So gentoo recently broke the kernel, see

3ce120b16cc5 ("kbuild: add '-fno-stack-check' to kernel build options")

and you say you hit the same problem with -rc6 and that commit is in
there so your kernel is probably built with -fno-stack-check.

Just a stab in the dark though: if you build your hello world program
with -fno-stack-check, does it segfault still?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ