linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx6: RDU2: disable internal watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqGE8GzHiHq0NRPoAKmrqv6ZDcFO+0=hnAEtog8jcnapyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:04:55 -0800
From:   Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx6: RDU2: disable internal watchdog

On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-zii-rdu2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-zii-rdu2.dtsi
>> index 6bef9a98678e..818bfc8692a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-zii-rdu2.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-zii-rdu2.dtsi
>> @@ -838,6 +838,10 @@
>>         status = "okay";
>>  };
>>
>> +&wdog1 {
>> +       status = "disabled";
>> +};
>> +
>>  &audmux {
>
> We should keep the nodes in alphabetical order. Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>

It seems that with exception of "audmux" and "iomuxc" the nodes are in
alphabetical order (and I suspect "audmux" falls under the same
exception "iomuxc" does?). What did you have in mind for that node?
Placing it after "audmux"?

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov