[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BAH4Dv7VFucBe080XQWoQ8pfmo1=4-sCa9L8PXJp_TfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:06:54 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx6: RDU2: disable internal watchdog
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com> wrote:
> It seems that with exception of "audmux" and "iomuxc" the nodes are in
> alphabetical order (and I suspect "audmux" falls under the same
> exception "iomuxc" does?). What did you have in mind for that node?
> Placing it after "audmux"?
Yes, putting 'wdog' after audmux would be better.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists