[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+FrS0Hmc-SfagJ1O2F69MN8KUec4TVZ-v9_HtTws3bRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:21:41 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Tom Horsley <horsley1953@...il.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: Weaken dumpability for secureexec
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 01:04:44 -0600
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>> > This weakens dumpability back to checking only for uid/gid changes in
>> > current (which is useless), but userspace depends on dumpability not
>> > being tied to secureexec.
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528633
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Tom Horsley <horsley1953@...il.com>
>>
>> Seems right, any chance we could get a tested-by: Tom? (Did we already
>> get that?)
>
> I didn't test it myself, but all I'd do is run the test program
> I've attached to the bugzilla above which is trivial compared
> to be learning how to patch and build kernels. So it would be
> much simpler for someone with the kernel already built to
> extract the tarball and type make :-).
This is what I did to verify it. Thank you very much for the test case!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists