[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4db358ab-3171-bb08-ca26-ec9bf282e8d4@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:36:22 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 14/15] ASoC: qcom: apq8096: Add db820c machine
driver
Thanks for your review comments,
On 03/01/18 17:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 09:34 AM, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c b/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..5b2036317f71
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>
> No clk usage though?
Will remove it in next version.
>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <sound/soc.h>
> [...]
>> +static int apq8096_sbc_parse_of(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = card->dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = snd_soc_of_parse_card_name(card, "qcom,model");
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(dev, "Error parsing card name: %d\n", ret);
>
> So this prints an error, and the caller also prints an error when it
> fails. Double error messages?
>
looks redundant, will remove it.
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int msm_snd_apq8096_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct snd_soc_card *card;
>> +
>> + card = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!card)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + card->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(card->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>
> Why do we need to do this? Can you add some sort of comment in the code
> about why?
Even though dsp supports 64 bit addresses, but the sid sits at offset of
32, which brings this restriction of supporting only 32 bit iova.
thanks,
srini
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists