linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: davinci: don't use static clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17d6af61-a6db-9dc6-6fde-e9ff44e57389@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:40:56 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: davinci: don't use static clk_lookup

Hi David,

On Monday 01 January 2018 05:09 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> In preparation of moving to the common clock framework, usage of static
> struct clk_lookup is removed. The common clock framework uses an opaque
> struct clk, so we won't be able to use static tables as was previously
> done.
> 
> davinci_clk_init() is changed to init a single clock instead of a table
> and an individual clk_register_clkdev() is added for each clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>

Is there a need for this considering in 6/7 you end up modifying quite a
bit of this patch again?

Thanks,
Sekhar