[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67zQVq_iqdKg2Rq0Dw27D8Or4U82Z2bK=EqXmuPPcdVQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 23:47:19 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, thomas@...sch.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/sun4i: backend: Wire in the frontend
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> Now that we have a driver, we can make use of it. This is done by
> adding a flag to our custom plane state that will trigger whether we should
> use the frontend on that particular plane or not.
>
> The rest is just plumbing to set up the backend to not perform the DMA but
> receive its data from the frontend.
>
> Note that we're still not making any use of the frontend itself, as no one
> is setting the flag yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.h | 8 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_crtc.c | 1 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.c | 33 +++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.h | 1 +-
> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> index f971d3fb5ee4..29e1ca7e01fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>
> #include "sun4i_backend.h"
> #include "sun4i_drv.h"
> +#include "sun4i_frontend.h"
> #include "sun4i_layer.h"
> #include "sunxi_engine.h"
>
> @@ -203,6 +204,30 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_formats(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int sun4i_backend_update_layer_frontend(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
> + int layer, uint32_t fmt)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = sun4i_backend_drm_format_to_layer(NULL, fmt, &val);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Invalid format\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(backend->engine.regs,
> + SUN4I_BACKEND_ATTCTL_REG0(layer),
> + SUN4I_BACKEND_ATTCTL_REG0_LAY_VDOEN,
> + SUN4I_BACKEND_ATTCTL_REG0_LAY_VDOEN);
You also need to select which frontend to use by setting LAY_VDOSEL.
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(backend->engine.regs,
> + SUN4I_BACKEND_ATTCTL_REG1(layer),
> + SUN4I_BACKEND_ATTCTL_REG1_LAY_FBFMT, val);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
> int layer, struct drm_plane *plane)
> {
> @@ -246,6 +271,36 @@ int sun4i_backend_update_layer_buffer(struct sun4i_backend *backend,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void sun4i_backend_vblank_quirk(struct sunxi_engine *engine)
> +{
> + struct sun4i_backend *backend = engine_to_sun4i_backend(engine);
> + struct sun4i_frontend *frontend = backend->frontend;
> +
> + if (!frontend)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * In a teardown scenario with the frontend involved, we have
> + * to keep the frontend enabled until the next vblank, and
> + * only then disable it.
> + *
> + * This is due to the fact that the backend will not take into
> + * account the new configuration (with the plane that used to
> + * be fed by the frontend now disabled) until we write to the
> + * commit bit and the hardware fetches the new configuration
> + * during the next vblank.
> + *
> + * So we keep the frontend around in order to prevent any
> + * visual artifacts.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&backend->frontend_lock);
> + if (backend->frontend_teardown) {
> + sun4i_frontend_exit(frontend);
> + backend->frontend_teardown = false;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&backend->frontend_lock);
> +};
> +
> static int sun4i_backend_init_sat(struct device *dev) {
> struct sun4i_backend *backend = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
> @@ -330,11 +385,40 @@ static int sun4i_backend_of_get_id(struct device_node *node)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct sun4i_frontend *sun4i_backend_find_frontend(struct sun4i_drv *drv,
> + struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct device_node *port, *ep, *remote;
> + struct sun4i_frontend *frontend;
> +
> + port = of_graph_get_port_by_id(node, 0);
> + if (!port)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(port, ep) {
> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
> + if (!remote)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* does this node match any registered engines? */
> + list_for_each_entry(frontend, &drv->frontend_list, list) {
> + if (remote == frontend->node) {
> + of_node_put(remote);
> + of_node_put(port);
> + return frontend;
This would return the same frontend for both backends in a dual pipeline setup.
Remember that we now have cross-connecting links between frontends and backends
of both pipelines.
Instead just match the frontend's ID to the backend's ID. BTW I think you left
out the ID thing in the frontend driver.
The rest looks good.
ChenYu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists