linux-kernel - Re: [0/4] video-UDLFB: Adjustments for five function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c2a6370-29f5-9486-2239-177b55d61f7a@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:44:52 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Bernie Thompson <bernie@...gable.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [0/4] video-UDLFB: Adjustments for five function implementations

>> * Do you find a Linux allocation failure report insufficient in this use case?
> 
> Yes,

Interesting …


> there is more information available currently in the driver and
> I see no real improvement in removing it.
> 
>> * Are you looking for any more clarification?
> 
> I will not apply any of such patches for now. The only exception
> being drivers that support hardware that can have only one instance
> in the system …

Thanks for your feedback.


> and the patch needs to be reviewed by a someone else than the author).

I am curious if this will ever happen again for my update suggestions
in such a software area.

Regards,
Markus