linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: Introduce davinci clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7f6a07e-1a37-b6be-6d99-bd2ae9bc4681@lechnology.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:46:01 -0600
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: Introduce davinci clocks



On 1/4/18 6:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2018 03:01 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> Forgot to cc linux-clk, so doing that now...
>>
>>
>> On 12/31/2017 05:39 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> This introduces new drivers for arch/arm/mach-davinci. The code is based
>>> on the clock drivers from there and adapted to use the common clock
>>> framework.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/clk/Makefile                      |   1 +
>>>    drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile              |   3 +
>>>    drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip-clk.c   | 380
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c                 | 333
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c                 | 217 +++++++++++++++++
>>>    include/linux/clk/davinci.h               |  46 ++++
>>>    include/linux/platform_data/davinci_clk.h |  25 ++
>>>    7 files changed, 1005 insertions(+)
> 
> This is a pretty huge patch and I think each of cfgchip, pll and PSC
> clocks deserve a patch of their own.

Will do.

> 
> On the PLL patch, please describe how the PLL implementation on DaVinci
> is different from Keystone, so no reuse is really possible. Similarly
> for the PSC patch (no non-DT support in keystone etc).

OK.

> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..8ae85ee
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> 
>>> +static void psc_config(struct davinci_psc_clk *psc,
>>> +               enum davinci_psc_state next_state)
>>> +{
>>> +    u32 epcpr, ptcmd, pdstat, pdctl, mdstat, mdctl, ptstat;
>>> +
>>> +    mdctl = readl(psc->base + MDCTL + 4 * psc->lpsc);
>>> +    mdctl &= ~MDSTAT_STATE_MASK;
>>> +    mdctl |= next_state;
>>> +    /* TODO: old davinci clocks for da850 set MDCTL_FORCE bit for
>>> sata and
>>> +     * dsp here. Is this really needed?
>>> +     */
>>> +    writel(mdctl, psc->base + MDCTL + 4 * psc->lpsc);
>>> +
>>> +    pdstat = readl(psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd);
>>> +    if ((pdstat & PDSTAT_STATE_MASK) == 0) {
>>> +        pdctl = readl(psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd);
>>> +        pdctl |= PDCTL_NEXT;
>>> +        writel(pdctl, psc->base + PDSTAT + 4 * psc->pd);
>>> +
>>> +        ptcmd = BIT(psc->pd);
>>> +        writel(ptcmd, psc->base + PTCMD);
>>> +
>>> +        do {
>>> +            epcpr = __raw_readl(psc->base + EPCPR);
>>> +        } while (!(epcpr & BIT(psc->pd)));
>>> +
>>> +        pdctl = __raw_readl(psc->base + PDCTL + 4 * psc->pd);
>>> +        pdctl |= PDCTL_EPCGOOD;
>>> +        __raw_writel(pdctl, psc->base + PDCTL + 4 * psc->pd);
> 
> Can we shift to regmap here too? Then the polling loops like above can
> be converted to regmap_read_poll_timeout() too like you have done elsewhere.
> 

I'll give it a try.