[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801041923440.2127@nanos>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:25:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: PTI build regression with nvidia drivers
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> This was pointed out in a few places, but not forwarded to lkml yet that I saw:
>
> https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1028222/linux/lts-kernel-patch-for-intel-cpu-vulnerability-breaks-nvidia-driver/post/5230546
>
> Before and after PTI, cpu_tlbstate is a GPL export:
>
> $ git show v4.14:arch/x86/mm/init.c | grep cpu_tlbstate
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct tlb_state, cpu_tlbstate) = {
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_tlbstate);
>
> But after PTI, inlining or something is dragging cpu_tlbstate into the
> open, causing build failures.
>
> Technically, to avoid regressions for that module, we'll need to drop
> the GPL marking on that symbol, or find some other solution...
Correct. It's indirect via the tlbflush inlines. We'll fix it as usual. Sigh....
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists