[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515099096.30693.19.camel@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 21:51:36 +0100
From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86: Use IBRS for firmware update path
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 09:56 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> @@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ static inline void apm_bios_call_asm(u32 func, u32 ebx_in,
> u32 ecx_in,
> "=S" (*esi)
> : "a" (func), "b" (ebx_in), "c" (ecx_in)
> : "memory", "cc");
> + unprotected_formware_end();
Just an obvious typo (form/firm) but I thought I'd report it.
> }
>
> static inline bool apm_bios_call_simple_asm(u32 func, u32 ebx_in,
> @@ -52,6 +56,7 @@ static inline bool apm_bios_call_simple_asm(u32 func, u32
> ebx_in,
> int cx, dx, si;
> bool error;
>
> + unprotected_firmware_begin();
> /*
> * N.B. We do NOT need a cld after the BIOS call
> * because we always save and restore the flags.
> @@ -68,6 +73,7 @@ static inline bool apm_bios_call_simple_asm(u32 func, u32
> ebx_in,
> "=S" (si)
> : "a" (func), "b" (ebx_in), "c" (ecx_in)
> : "memory", "cc");
> + unprotected_formware_end();
> return error;
> }
Same here.
--
Yves-Alexis
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists