[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180105165601.fzzzztr52s34vaaz@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:56:01 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] x86/cpu/AMD: Make LFENCE a serializing
instruction on AMD
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:07:36AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> To aid in speculation control, the LFENCE instruction will be turned into
> a serializing instruction. There is less performance impact using LFENCE
> in this way compared to MFENCE.
>
> With LFENCE now being a serializing instruction, it can be used in
> rdtsc_ordered() in place of MFENCE_RDTSC. The other two patches in this
> series make this change and remove the MFENCE_RDTSC feature.
>
> The following patches are included in this series:
> - Make LFENCE a serializing instruction on AMD
> - Change over to LFENCE_RDTSC from MFENCE_RDTSC on AMD
> - Remove the MFENCE_RDTSC feature
>
> This patch series is based on tip:x86/pti.
>
> ---
>
> Tom Lendacky (3):
> x86/cpu/AMD: Make LFENCE a serializing instruction
> x86/cpu/AMD: Use LFENCE_RDTSC instead of MFENCE_RDTSC
> x86/msr: Remove now unused definition of MFENCE_RDTSC feature
All three:
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists