linux-kernel - Re: platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <edb7173f-c732-6934-9690-7831b3f993d8@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Sat, 6 Jan 2018 09:55:31 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@....eng.br>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function
 implementations

> If this was code that affected all systems, the impact would be greater
> - and it would be much easier to test.

I can follow such a view to some degree.
Would you dare to test the deletion of questionable error messages
more with any other software components?


> As it applies only to Thinkpad systems,

Are these models still popular enough in any areas?


> far fewer total systems are affected, and it is much harder to
> test/verify.

Do you care for the suggested transformation patterns (in principle)?


> If you feel that is the wrong call,

It seems that the usual indication was expressed for change resistance.


> you will need to present convincing evidence to Henrique that
> this is worth the risk.

Which risks have you got in mind for this small adjustment?


> … - or that it would be worth the effort.

Can a bit of “software fine-tuning” become useful also here?

Regards,
Markus