[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73a551af-2339-c522-188a-d73a58fd03d1@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:06:36 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework
On Saturday 06 January 2018 07:12 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 01/05/2018 04:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Friday 05 January 2018 08:29 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2018 11:50 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>>>> On 1/4/18 6:39 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>
>>>>> This is a pretty huge patch again and I hope it can be broken down.
>>>>> Ideally one per SoC converted and then the unused code removal.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will do.
>>>
>>> Well, I can do this, but I don't think it will compile or run. We can't
>>> have the common clock framework and the legacy davinci clocks enabled at
>>> the same time.
>>
>> I see. Can you at least hive off the code removal into a separate patch
>> for next submission. I will then take a closer look at this.
>>
>
> I've realized that I can accomplish this if I use some #if 0/#endif blocks
> temporarily if that sounds OK.
I haven't looked at your latest submission, but this wont be acceptable.
Even as a temporary measure.
If the patch cannot be broken down any, thats fine. I just wanted to
explore the possibility to ease review.
Thanks,
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists