linux-kernel - Re: perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180109125346.17cad4a5@vmware.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:53:46 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7

On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:14:00 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:12:53PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > In any case, I found yet another lockdep splat, trying to figure out wth
> > to do about that.  
> 
> An of course, testing this one yields yet another lockdep splat..
> onwards to #3 :/
> 
> ---
> Subject: perf: Fix another perf,trace,cpuhp lock inversion
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Tue Jan 9 17:07:59 CET 2018
> 
> Lockdep complained about:
> 
>         perf_trace_init()
> #0        mutex_lock(&event_mutex)
>           perf_trace_event_init()
>             perf_trace_event_reg()
>               tp_event->class->reg() := tracepoint_probe_register
> #1              mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex)
>                   trace_point_add_func()
> #2                  static_key_enable()
> 
> 
> 
> #2	do_cpu_up()
> 	  perf_event_init_cpu()
> #3	    mutex_lock(&pmus_lock)
> #4	    mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex)
> 
> 
> 	perf_ioctl()
> #4	  ctx = perf_event_ctx_lock()
> 	  _perf_iotcl()
> 	    ftrace_profile_set_filter()
> #0	      mutex_lock(&event_mutex)
> 
> 
> Fudge it for now by noting that the tracepoint state does not depend
> on the event <-> context relation. Ugly though :/
> 

Looking at ftrace_profile_set_filter(), I see it starts with:

	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);

How much of a big deal would it be if we move taking event_mutex() into
perf_ioctl(), and then make ftrace_profile_set_filter() not take the
event_mutex. This is the only place that function is used. Would that
work?

Below is a patch (totally untested, not even compiled)


-- Steve

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 4df5b695bf0d..9fac7ac14b32 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4741,9 +4741,11 @@ static long perf_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 	struct perf_event_context *ctx;
 	long ret;
 
+	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
 	ctx = perf_event_ctx_lock(event);
 	ret = _perf_ioctl(event, cmd, arg);
 	perf_event_ctx_unlock(event, ctx);
+	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index 61e7f0678d33..46c2e5d20662 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -2256,6 +2256,7 @@ static int ftrace_function_set_filter(struct perf_event *event,
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */
 
+/* Must have event_mutex held */
 int ftrace_profile_set_filter(struct perf_event *event, int event_id,
 			      char *filter_str)
 {
@@ -2263,17 +2264,14 @@ int ftrace_profile_set_filter(struct perf_event *event, int event_id,
 	struct event_filter *filter;
 	struct trace_event_call *call;
 
-	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&event_mutex);
 
 	call = event->tp_event;
-
-	err = -EINVAL;
 	if (!call)
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = -EEXIST;
 	if (event->filter)
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return -EEXIST;
 
 	err = create_filter(call, filter_str, false, &filter);
 	if (err)
@@ -2288,9 +2286,6 @@ int ftrace_profile_set_filter(struct perf_event *event, int event_id,
 	if (err || ftrace_event_is_function(call))
 		__free_filter(filter);
 
-out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
-
 	return err;
 }