[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180109180207.GM6176@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:02:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: perf: perf_fuzzer quickly locks up on 4.15-rc7
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:53:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Looking at ftrace_profile_set_filter(), I see it starts with:
>
> mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
>
> How much of a big deal would it be if we move taking event_mutex() into
> perf_ioctl(), and then make ftrace_profile_set_filter() not take the
> event_mutex. This is the only place that function is used. Would that
> work?
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 4df5b695bf0d..9fac7ac14b32 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -4741,9 +4741,11 @@ static long perf_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> struct perf_event_context *ctx;
> long ret;
>
> + mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> ctx = perf_event_ctx_lock(event);
> ret = _perf_ioctl(event, cmd, arg);
> perf_event_ctx_unlock(event, ctx);
> + mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
>
> return ret;
> }
This would globally serialize all perf_ioctl()'s, also that event_mutex
is for trace_events and really does not belong in perf.
So no, I really rather would not do this.
The alternative I was thinking of was lifting the cpuhp lock out from
under event_mutex, that would also break the chain, but would probably
be lots of work for trace bits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists