linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180109200417.GB19756@char.us.oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:04:17 -0500
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     christian.koenig@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v5

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:47:55AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > I perfectly agree on that, but this is for stable kernel backports. Because
> > of this I want to keep the footprint as low as possible.
> > 
> > When your patchset to clean that up lands for 4.16 I have no problem
> > changing that.
> > 
> > But till then I think we should just work on suppress the warning for now.
> 
> Oh well.  If Konrad is fine with that I'll stick it in front of my
> swiotlb series (the next post is going to be split) with a stable tag,
> so everything is well integrated.

Totally. Thanks for taking care of it - been slammed with x86 architecture craziness.