[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515460999.4423.104.camel@amazon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 01:23:19 +0000
From: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"keescook@...gle.com" <keescook@...gle.com>,
"gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/10] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows
on context switch II
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 17:21 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:16:02PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > If we clear the registers, what the hell are you going to put in the
> > > RSB that helps you?
> >
> > RSB allows you to control chains of gadgets.
>
> I admit the gadget thing is a bit obscure.
>
> There's another case we were actually more worried about:
>
> On Skylake and Broadwell when the RSB underflows it will fall back to the
> indirect branch predictor, which can be poisoned and we try to avoid
> using with retpoline. So we try to avoid underflows, and this filling
> helps us with that.
That's no longer true for Broadwell with the latest microcode, right?
And is why we *were* talking about using retpoline only for pre-
Skylake, and using IBRS on Skylake onwards (where IBRS isn't quite so
horribly slow anyway).
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5210 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists