[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180109014916.GI6718@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 17:49:16 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc: "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"keescook@...gle.com" <keescook@...gle.com>,
"gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/10] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows
on context switch II
> > On Skylake and Broadwell when the RSB underflows it will fall back to theĀ
> > indirect branch predictor, which can be poisoned and we try to avoid
> > using with retpoline. So we try to avoid underflows, and this filling
> > helps us with that.
>
> That's no longer true for Broadwell with the latest microcode, right?
That's right.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists