[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110054507.GB2575@danjae.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:45:07 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org,
vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
rajvi.jingar@...el.com, julia@...com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/37] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:02:22AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is V8 of the inter-event tracing patchset, addressing input from
> V7.
>
> These changes address Namhyung's most recent comments (thanks,
> Namhyung!) and move everything to the latest tracing/for-next:
>
> - moved a couple hunks switching hist_field_fn_t params from 15/37
> (add variable support) to 20/37 (Pass tracing_map_elt to
> hist_field_accessor)
> - in hist_trigger_elt_data_alloc(), remove the unnecessary '+1' from
> TASK_COMM_LEN size.
> - simplified find_var_file() code according to Namhyung's
> suggestions.
> - fixed bug in print_synth_event() where entry->fields was being
> used instead of the address as it should have been
I only have a nitpick in the patch 24 but otherwise cannot find an
issue anymore, so
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists