linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/37] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180110022054.1086b477@vmware.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 02:20:54 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
        rajvi.jingar@...el.com, julia@...com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/37] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support

On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:45:07 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:02:22AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is V8 of the inter-event tracing patchset, addressing input from
> > V7.
> > 
> > These changes address Namhyung's most recent comments (thanks,
> > Namhyung!) and move everything to the latest tracing/for-next:
> > 
> >   - moved a couple hunks switching hist_field_fn_t params from 15/37
> >     (add variable support) to 20/37 (Pass tracing_map_elt to
> >     hist_field_accessor)
> >   - in hist_trigger_elt_data_alloc(), remove the unnecessary '+1' from
> >     TASK_COMM_LEN size.
> >   - simplified find_var_file() code according to Namhyung's
> >     suggestions.
> >   - fixed bug in print_synth_event() where entry->fields was being
> >     used instead of the address as it should have been  
> 
> I only have a nitpick in the patch 24 but otherwise cannot find an
> issue anymore, so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>

Thanks for reviewing this Namhyung.

I'm currently traveling (what else is new?), and I want to start
pulling this in. It wont be ready for the next merge window as it's too
close, but I want to get it in by the one after that. I need to
allocate some time to pull these patches in and review them as well.

-- Steve