[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110132930-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:30:52 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kristina.martsenko@....com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/16] virtio: Validate queue pfn for 32bit transports
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:19:34AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 January 2018 at 11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > For virtio-mmio? I don't seem to see that code in
> > hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> > For example I still see handling for VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_PFN
> > there, and no handling for VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_DESC_LOW
> > and such.
>
> Are there uses that make it worthwhile to get virtio-1
> support added to virtio-mmio, rather than just getting
> people to move over to virtio-pci instead ?
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
I keep getting these patches (like the one that started this thread) so
I think yes. If nothing else the guest support will bit-rot without
an open-source implementation.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists