[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3672aa56-b85c-5d2c-0c0e-709031b0c0a0@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:06:22 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, patches@...ups.riscv.org,
linux-metag@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cris-kernel@...s.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/33] dma-direct: use node local allocations for coherent
memory
On 10/01/18 08:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> To preserve the x86 behavior.
And combined with patch 10/22 of the SWIOTLB refactoring, this means
SWIOTLB allocations will also end up NUMA-aware, right? Great, that's
what we want on arm64 too :)
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> lib/dma-direct.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/dma-direct.c b/lib/dma-direct.c
> index a9ae98be7af3..f04a424f91fa 100644
> --- a/lib/dma-direct.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-direct.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, page_order, gfp);
> if (!page)
> - page = alloc_pages(gfp, page_order);
> + page = alloc_pages_node(dev_to_node(dev), gfp, page_order);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists