[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110153017.GD17790@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:30:17 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, patches@...ups.riscv.org,
linux-metag@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cris-kernel@...s.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/33] dma-direct: use node local allocations for
coherent memory
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:06:22PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 10/01/18 08:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> To preserve the x86 behavior.
>
> And combined with patch 10/22 of the SWIOTLB refactoring, this means
> SWIOTLB allocations will also end up NUMA-aware, right? Great, that's what
> we want on arm64 too :)
Well, only for swiotlb allocations that can be satisfied by
dma_direct_alloc. If we actually have to fall back to the swiotlb
buffers there is not node affinity yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists