[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110171156.GC3530@jade>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:11:56 -0200
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] V4L2 Explicit Synchronization
2018-01-10 Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>:
> Le mercredi 10 janvier 2018 à 14:07 -0200, Gustavo Padovan a écrit :
> > v7 bring a fix for a crash when not using fences and a uAPI fix.
> > I've done a bit more of testing on it and also measured some
> > performance. On a intel laptop a DRM<->V4L2 pipeline with fences is
> > runnning twice as faster than the same pipeline with no fences.
>
> What does it mean twice faster here ?
That capture then display on the screen for a given number of frames was
completing in about half of the time when using fences and passing then
to the other driver right away when they are received.
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists