linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180111094759.aohvm5tqztza72es@pd.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:47:59 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "Thomas.Lendacky@....com" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Ghitulete, Razvan-alin" <rga@...zon.com>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
        "keescook@...gle.com" <keescook@...gle.com>,
        "gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        "pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
        "jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
        "gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:32:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> can't you do lovely things like:
> 
> 	volatile asm ("call __fill_rsb_thunk_%1" : : "r" (dummy))
> 
> which would still let gcc select the register ?

Calling a function from asm is nasty because you need to pay attention
to clobbered registers as gcc doesn't see the function.

What one can do, I *think*, is do a non-inlined wrapping function and do
all the alternative_call() fun inside. There you can do all the fun and
have callee-clobbered regs which you can use.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.