linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 00/13] drivers: Boot Constraint core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:21:52 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Xu Wei <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/13] drivers: Boot Constraint core

On 10-01-18, 10:54, Olof Johansson wrote:
> The SoC-specific pieces should preferrably go under drivers/soc
> instead, to reduce cross-tree dependencies when introducing new SoC
> variants.
> 
> They're more related to the SoC than to the boot_constraint framework anyway.

Hmm, okay.

> Bikeshed: We've traditionally had really terse and precise names under
> drivers/. This is the first verbose one with a _ in it. Maybe find a
> shorter name or just concatenate to 'bootconstraints'? We didn't call
> it remote_proc or rapid_io, etc, either. :)

Sure.

-- 
viresh