linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2.1] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMzpN2iGjR=1aPp17gyEk2i=FCZ_KDfV+JoLzkHY980UNC4TZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:22:43 -0500
From:   Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, rga@...zon.de,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 02:28:32PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 08:20 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> >
>> > This seems weird.  I liked v1 a lot better.  What's the problem with
>> > patching in the whole thing?
>> >
>> > Also, if you go back to v1, it should be an easy objtool fix, just add
>> > ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE in front of it.
>>
>> The objection was that I was patching in a fairly long set of
>> instructions. I confess I don't actually know why that's a problem,
>
> You get a giant string of NOPs, a single jmp should be faster.

That could be handled in add_nops(), where if over a certain threshold
it changes to a JMP.

--
Brian Gerst