[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515684226.22302.357.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:23:46 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, rga@...zon.de,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 10:22 -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 02:28:32PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 08:20 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This seems weird. I liked v1 a lot better. What's the problem with
> >> > patching in the whole thing?
> >> >
> >> > Also, if you go back to v1, it should be an easy objtool fix, just add
> >> > ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE in front of it.
> >>
> >> The objection was that I was patching in a fairly long set of
> >> instructions. I confess I don't actually know why that's a problem,
> >
> > You get a giant string of NOPs, a single jmp should be faster.
>
> That could be handled in add_nops(), where if over a certain threshold
> it changes to a JMP.
Currently that only processes the *altinstr* doesn't it? Not the
oldinstr?
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists