[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65d04510-bd88-7afe-27b5-d5e9cb416949@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:17:33 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
architt@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] base: power: runtime: Export
pm_runtime_get/put_suppliers
On 01/12/2018 04:23 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Vivek Gautam
> <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> The device link allows the pm framework to tie the supplier and
>> consumer. So, whenever the consumer is powered-on the supplier
>> is powered-on first.
>>
>> There are however cases in which the consumer wants to power-on
>> the supplier, but not itself.
>> E.g., A Graphics or multimedia driver wants to power-on the SMMU
>> to unmap a buffer and finish the TLB operations without powering
>> on itself. Some of these unmap requests are coming from the
>> user space when the controller itself is not powered-up, and it
>> can be huge penalty in terms of power and latency to power-up
>> the graphics/mm controllers.
>> There can be an argument that the supplier should handle this case
>> on its own and there should not be a need for the consumer to
>> power-on the supplier. But as discussed on the thread [1] about
>> ARM-SMMU runtime pm, we don't want to introduce runtime pm calls
>> in atomic path in arm_smmu_unmap.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9827825/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Please feel free to route this along with the rest of the series.
Thanks Rafael.
regards
Vivek
>
> Thanks!
>
>> ---
>>
>> * This is v2 of the patch [1]. Adding it to this patch series.
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10102447/
>>
>> drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
>> index 6e89b51ea3d9..06a2a88fe866 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
>> @@ -1579,6 +1579,7 @@ void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct device *dev)
>>
>> device_links_read_unlock(idx);
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_runtime_get_suppliers);
>>
>> /**
>> * pm_runtime_put_suppliers - Drop references to supplier devices.
>> @@ -1597,6 +1598,7 @@ void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev)
>>
>> device_links_read_unlock(idx);
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_runtime_put_suppliers);
>>
>> void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> --
>> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
>> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists