linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm/pkeys: Fix fill_sig_info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180112203135.4669-2-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:31:35 -0600
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm/pkeys: Fix fill_sig_info_pkey

SEGV_PKUERR is a signal specific si_code which happens to have the
same numeric value as several others: BUS_MCEERR_AR, ILL_ILLTRP,
FPE_FLTOVF, TRAP_HWBKPT, CLD_TRAPPED, POLL_ERR, SEGV_THREAD_ID,
as such it is not safe to just test the si_code the signal number
must also be tested to prevent a false positive in fill_sig_info_pkey.

I found this error by inspection, and BUS_MCEERR_AR appears to
be a real candidate for confusion.  So pass in si_signo and fix it.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Fixes: 019132ff3daf ("x86/mm/pkeys: Fill in pkey field in siginfo")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 06fe3d51d385..b3e40773dce0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -172,14 +172,15 @@ is_prefetch(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long addr)
  * 6. T1   : reaches here, sees vma_pkey(vma)=5, when we really
  *	     faulted on a pte with its pkey=4.
  */
-static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_code, siginfo_t *info, u32 *pkey)
+static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_signo, int si_code, siginfo_t *info,
+		u32 *pkey)
 {
 	/* This is effectively an #ifdef */
 	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
 		return;
 
 	/* Fault not from Protection Keys: nothing to do */
-	if (si_code != SEGV_PKUERR)
+	if ((si_code != SEGV_PKUERR) || (si_signo != SIGSEGV))
 		return;
 	/*
 	 * force_sig_info_fault() is called from a number of
@@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code, unsigned long address,
 		lsb = PAGE_SHIFT;
 	info.si_addr_lsb = lsb;
 
-	fill_sig_info_pkey(si_code, &info, pkey);
+	fill_sig_info_pkey(si_signo, si_code, &info, pkey);
 
 	force_sig_info(si_signo, &info, tsk);
 }
-- 
2.14.1