[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180112225947.GL21458@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:59:47 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PM regression in next
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 02:49:59PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> [180112 22:11]:
> > Most devices have one regmap per device which can be retrieved with
> > dev_get_regmap(), it's the attempt to use that which I suspect is
> > broken. Like I said snd_soc_codec_init_regmap() ought to fix things if
> > that's the issue.
> OK. Adding Peter to loop as it's his driver after all. Not sure
> how well mixing regmap register access to the same module with
> cached twl4030_read() would work :)
Yes, that local cache is not a super good idea any more and hopefully
redundant.
> Maybe there should also be some big warning happening if
> snd_soc_codec_init_regmap() is now needed and no regmap is
> found?
Some devices just plain don't have registers at all (perhaps GPIOs or
just stub drivers providing capability information). However we should
be screaming loudly about the fact that the I/O we tried to do fails,
that clearly shouldn't be being ignored.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists