[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wp0jzyig.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 01:45:51 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PM regression in next
Hi all
> > > Most devices have one regmap per device which can be retrieved with
> > > dev_get_regmap(), it's the attempt to use that which I suspect is
> > > broken. Like I said snd_soc_codec_init_regmap() ought to fix things if
> > > that's the issue.
>
> > OK. Adding Peter to loop as it's his driver after all. Not sure
> > how well mixing regmap register access to the same module with
> > cached twl4030_read() would work :)
>
> Yes, that local cache is not a super good idea any more and hopefully
> redundant.
>
> > Maybe there should also be some big warning happening if
> > snd_soc_codec_init_regmap() is now needed and no regmap is
> > found?
>
> Some devices just plain don't have registers at all (perhaps GPIOs or
> just stub drivers providing capability information). However we should
> be screaming loudly about the fact that the I/O we tried to do fails,
> that clearly shouldn't be being ignored.
I'm sorry that my patch breaks your drivers.
It seems removing .read/.write callback was too much aggressive.
I hope your driver will be OK by using regmap.
In worst case, we can back .read/.write, but it will be component driver side.
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists