lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:53:34 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <>
To:     Tom Lendacky <>
Cc:     X86 ML <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Rik van Riel <>,
        Andi Kleen <>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <>,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,
        Linus Torvalds <>,
        Jiri Kosina <>,
        Dave Hansen <>,
        Borislav Petkov <>,
        Andy Lutomirski <>,
        Kees Cook <>,
        Thomas Gleixner <>,
        Tim Chen <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        David Woodhouse <>,
        Paul Turner <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/retpoline: Use lfence in the retpoline/RSB filling
 RSB macros

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Tom Lendacky <> wrote:
> The pause instruction is currently used in the retpoline and RSB filling
> macros as a speculation trap.  The use of pause was originally suggested
> because it showed a very, very small difference in the amount of
> cycles/time used to execute the retpoline as compared to lfence.  On AMD,
> the pause instruction is not a serializing instruction, so the pause/jmp
> loop will use excess power as it is speculated over waiting for return
> to mispredict to the correct target.
> The RSB filling macro is applicable to AMD, and, if software is unable to
> verify that lfence is serializing on AMD (possible when running under a
> hypervisor), the generic retpoline support will be used and, so, is also
> applicable to AMD.  Change the use of pause to lfence.

Should we use ASM_IFENCE for this?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists