[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1516038103.4937.2.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:41:43 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert()
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 11:22 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> And also, people without objtool enabled (i.e., no ORC or livepatch)
> won't see the assertion. Do we care about those people? :-)
I think that's OK. Peter is right that this *would* be a GCC
regression. Someone who *does* have objtool enabled would see it, and
we'd be aware of it. That's enough to assuage my paranoia.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists