lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:11:59 +0100
From:   Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To:     Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>,
        Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@...com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
        Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>,
        Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
        Mickael REULIER <mickael.reulier@...com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: add optional pixel clock

On 15.01.2018 15:40, Philippe CORNU wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> On 01/15/2018 02:52 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 12.01.2018 17:25, Philippe Cornu wrote:
>>> The pixel clock is optional. When available, it offers a better
>>> preciseness for timing computations and allows to reduce the extra dsi
>>> bandwidth in burst mode (from ~20% to ~10-12%, hw platform dependent).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2: Improve px_clk probing in case of ENOENT dt returned value
>>> (thanks to Philipp Zabel & Andrzej Hajda comments)
>>>
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>> index c39c7dce20ed..62fcff881b98 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>> @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct dw_mipi_dsi {
>>>   	void __iomem *base;
>>>   
>>>   	struct clk *pclk;
>>> +	struct clk *px_clk;
>>>   
>>>   	unsigned int lane_mbps; /* per lane */
>>>   	u32 channel;
>>> @@ -753,24 +754,28 @@ void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>>   	struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
>>>   	const struct dw_mipi_dsi_phy_ops *phy_ops = dsi->plat_data->phy_ops;
>>>   	void *priv_data = dsi->plat_data->priv_data;
>>> +	struct drm_display_mode px_clk_mode = *mode;
>>>   	int ret;
>>>   
>>>   	clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
>>>   
>>> -	ret = phy_ops->get_lane_mbps(priv_data, mode, dsi->mode_flags,
>>> +	if (dsi->px_clk)
>>> +		px_clk_mode.clock = clk_get_rate(dsi->px_clk) / 1000;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = phy_ops->get_lane_mbps(priv_data, &px_clk_mode, dsi->mode_flags,
>>>   				     dsi->lanes, dsi->format, &dsi->lane_mbps);
>>>   	if (ret)
>>>   		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Phy get_lane_mbps() failed\n");
>>>   
>>>   	pm_runtime_get_sync(dsi->dev);
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_init(dsi);
>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(dsi, mode);
>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(dsi, &px_clk_mode);
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_packet_handler_config(dsi);
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_video_mode_config(dsi);
>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(dsi, mode);
>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(dsi, &px_clk_mode);
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_command_mode_config(dsi);
>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_line_timer_config(dsi, mode);
>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_vertical_timing_config(dsi, mode);
>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_line_timer_config(dsi, &px_clk_mode);
>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_vertical_timing_config(dsi, &px_clk_mode);
>>>   
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_init(dsi);
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_timing_config(dsi);
>>> @@ -784,7 +789,7 @@ void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>>   
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_enable(dsi);
>>>   
>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(mode);
>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(&px_clk_mode);
>>>   
>>>   	/* Switch to cmd mode for panel-bridge pre_enable & panel prepare */
>>>   	dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, 0);
>>> @@ -878,6 +883,15 @@ __dw_mipi_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>   		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>> +	dsi->px_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "px_clk");
>>> +	if (PTR_ERR(dsi->px_clk) == -ENOENT) {
>>> +		dsi->px_clk = NULL;
>>> +	} else if (IS_ERR(dsi->px_clk)) {
>>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->px_clk);
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "Unable to get optional px_clk: %d\n", ret);
>>> +		dsi->px_clk = NULL;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>> As I understand on fail you just log an error and continue?
>> The code could be slightly simplified, for example:
>> dsi->px_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "px_clk");
>> if (IS_ERR(dsi->px_clk)) {
>>          ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->px_clk);
>>          if (ret != ENOENT)
>>                  dev_err(dev, "Unable to get optional px_clk: %d\n", ret);
>>          dsi->px_clk = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> With or without this change:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
>>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> Yes in this version, on fail, I just log an error and continue, 
> especially because this px_clk is "optional" in the documentation. Then 
> your proposal is much better than mine : )
>
> Nevertheless, I wonder now if it could be better to "return" in case of 
> error as we do for others mandatory clocks...
> So then, the code could be:
>
> dsi->px_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "px_clk");
> if (IS_ERR(dsi->px_clk)) {
> 	dsi->px_clk = NULL;
> 	ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->px_clk);
> 	if (ret != ENOENT) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "Unable to get optional px_clk: %d\n", ret);
> 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> 	}
> }
>
>
> Do you (or someone else) have a preferred choice?

No strong feelings, but I would slightly prefer current version: error
is reported but the driver tries to do the best to continue work.
On the other side it increases risk that the error will be ignored and
potential bug not fixed.
Choice between robustness and strictness.

Regards
Andrzej

>
>
> Many thanks,
> Philippe :-)
>
>>   --
>> Regards
>> Andrzej
>>
>>
>>>   	/*
>>>   	 * Note that the reset was not defined in the initial device tree, so
>>>   	 * we have to be prepared for it not being found.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ