linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:49:11 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review

On 16 January 2018 at 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:03:06PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release.
>> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 17 12:33:26 UTC 2018.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >     kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.77-rc1.gz
>> > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
>
> Really?  Did you test ebpf?  If not, can you go and manually do that (I
> don't know if it's part of your skips), as it is important here...

We do not have selftests/bpf tests for 4.9
So running 4.14 version of bpf test cases on 4.9 kernel causing these failures.

bpf# ./test_tag
  test_tag: test_ta[ 2947.456687] audit: type=1701
audit(1516100826.662:8): auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 ses=4294967295
pid=2672 comm="test_6
  g.c:111: tag_from_fdinfo: Assertion `!ret' failed.
  Aborted (core dumped)

bpf# gdb ./test_tag
  <>
  test_tag: test_tag.c:111: tag_from_fdinfo: Assertion `!ret' failed.
  Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
  0x0000ffffb7e96a00 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6

bpf# gdb ./test_lpm_map
   Starting program: /opt/kselftests/mainline/bpf/test_lpm_map
   test_lpm_map: test_lpm_map.c:191: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed.
   Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
   0x0000ffffb7e96a00 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6

The error log is same before and after the previous stable reviews.
We have old bugs on these issues,
LKFT: 4.4 and 4.9: kselftest: bpf: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
LKFT: 4.4 and 4.9: kselftest: bpf: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3116

- Naresh

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> _______________________________________________
> Lkft-triage mailing list
> Lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lkft-triage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives