linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:16:53 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 16 January 2018 at 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:03:06PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release.
> >> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> > let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 17 12:33:26 UTC 2018.
> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >> >
> >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >> >     kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.77-rc1.gz
> >> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> >> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>
> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> >> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> >
> > Really?  Did you test ebpf?  If not, can you go and manually do that (I
> > don't know if it's part of your skips), as it is important here...
> 
> We do not have selftests/bpf tests for 4.9
> So running 4.14 version of bpf test cases on 4.9 kernel causing these failures.
> 
> bpf# ./test_tag
>   test_tag: test_ta[ 2947.456687] audit: type=1701
> audit(1516100826.662:8): auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 ses=4294967295
> pid=2672 comm="test_6
>   g.c:111: tag_from_fdinfo: Assertion `!ret' failed.
>   Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> bpf# gdb ./test_tag
>   <>
>   test_tag: test_tag.c:111: tag_from_fdinfo: Assertion `!ret' failed.
>   Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
>   0x0000ffffb7e96a00 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> 
> bpf# gdb ./test_lpm_map
>    Starting program: /opt/kselftests/mainline/bpf/test_lpm_map
>    test_lpm_map: test_lpm_map.c:191: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed.
>    Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
>    0x0000ffffb7e96a00 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> 
> The error log is same before and after the previous stable reviews.
> We have old bugs on these issues,
> LKFT: 4.4 and 4.9: kselftest: bpf: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3119
> LKFT: 4.4 and 4.9: kselftest: bpf: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3116

Ok, I guess we are just as broken as before, I'll take it!  :)

thanks,

greg k-h