linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] turn on force option for FUSE in builtin policies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANxcAMtH18ONM2Fn1jjH7_UNq713P-RiM4hUoSw09LZ7Ds3MTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:05:54 +0100
From:   Dongsu Park <dongsu@...volk.io>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] turn on force option for FUSE in builtin policies

Hi Mimi,

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
>> Since yesterday Alban and I have been working on a different approach
>> that does not depend on IMA rules, nor fsmagic. Please see:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1587390.html
>>
>> If that's ok, I'm ready to discard this patchset.
>
> You dropped a number of people involved in this discussion and mailing
> lists.  Please post the proposed patch inline as an RFC, cc'ing the
> same people, those involved in the discussion, and previous mailing
> lists, including LSM, integrity, and fsdevel.

Sorry about that. Starting from the patchset v2, we will add Cc correctly.
Thank you also for the detailed review.

Dongsu

> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>