[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1516111587.1648.0@smtp.crapouillou.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:06:27 +0100
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...s.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/15] MIPS: ingenic: Detect machtype from SoC
compatible string
Hi James,
Le mer. 10 janv. 2018 à 23:27, James Hogan <james.hogan@...s.com> a
écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 07:25:08PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Previously, the mips_machtype variable was always initialized
>> to MACH_INGENIC_JZ4740 even if running on different SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>> ---
>> arch/mips/jz4740/prom.c | 1 -
>> arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> v2: No change
>> v3: No change
>> v4: No change
>> v5: Use SPDX license identifier
>> v6: Init mips_machtype from DT compatible string instead of using
>> MIPS_MACHINE
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/jz4740/prom.c b/arch/mips/jz4740/prom.c
>> index a62dd8e6ecf9..eb9f2f97bedb 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/jz4740/prom.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/jz4740/prom.c
>> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>>
>> void __init prom_init(void)
>> {
>> - mips_machtype = MACH_INGENIC_JZ4740;
>> fw_init_cmdline();
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c b/arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c
>> index 6d0152321819..cd89536fbba1 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c
>> @@ -53,16 +53,30 @@ static void __init jz4740_detect_mem(void)
>> add_memory_region(0, size, BOOT_MEM_RAM);
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned long __init get_board_mach_type(const void *fdt)
>> +{
>> + if (!fdt_node_check_compatible(fdt, 0, "ingenic,jz4780"))
>> + return MACH_INGENIC_JZ4780;
>> + if (!fdt_node_check_compatible(fdt, 0, "ingenic,jz4770"))
>> + return MACH_INGENIC_JZ4770;
>> +
>> + return MACH_INGENIC_JZ4740;
>> +}
>> +
>> void __init plat_mem_setup(void)
>> {
>> int offset;
>>
>> + if (!early_init_dt_scan(__dtb_start))
>> + return;
>> +
>> jz4740_reset_init();
>> - __dt_setup_arch(__dtb_start);
>
> Is it intentional that by removing this we no longer set the machine
> name, so it'll default to "unknown"? The commit message doesn't
> mention
> that change.
>
> Cheers
> James
You're right, thank you for spotting that. I'll send a revised version
ASAP.
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists