lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180116150217.GB27126@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:02:17 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the staging tree

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:47:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 6:59 AM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 01:45:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> After merging the staging tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >>
> >> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/module.c: In function 'lnet_selftest_init':
> >> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/module.c:98:10: warning: 'rc' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >>    return rc;
> >>           ^~
> >>
> >> Introduced by commit
> >>
> >>   6106c0f82481 ("staging: lustre: lnet: convert selftest to use workqueues")
> >
> > Yeah, I told Neil about this, hopefully he sends me a fix soon :)
> 
> I sent a fix for that one, but now ran into another problem that I can't
> easily figure out:
> 
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/module.c: In function 'lnet_selftest_init':
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/module.c:128:49: error: 'struct
> cfs_cpt_table' has no member named 'ctb_parts'; did you mean
> 'ctb_nparts'?
>    cpumask_copy(attrs.cpumask, lnet_cpt_table()->ctb_parts[i].cpt_cpumask);
> 
> I see that there are two definitions of 'struct cfs_cpt_table', and only
> one of them has a ctb_parts member, but I don't know what this means
> for its users.
> 
> The build regression also comes from commit 6106c0f82481 ("staging:
> lustre: lnet: convert selftest to use workqueues"), and I see that all
> other references to ctb_parts are in
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/libcfs/linux/linux-cpu.c.

Odd, I can't duplicate the build error here, but 0-day also complains
about this.  Neil is out until Friday, so maybe he can fix it up then...

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ