linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio-ccw: update documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:17:08 +0100
From:   Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio-ccw: update documentation



On 01/15/2018 11:43 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> The vfio-ccw documentation comes from the cover letter of the
> original patch submission, which shows in some parts. Give it some
> love; in particular:
> 
> - Remove/rework statements that make sense in a cover letter, but not
>   in regular documentation.
> - Fix some typos.
> - Describe the current limitations in more detail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>

The changes look sane and definitively improve on what we have
right now. Acked by me if you like.

When we are at the limitations, the prefetch story seems to be
still missing. IMHO it's the most important limitation.

Regards,
Halil