linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio-ccw: update documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180116172818.6f35a1c0.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:28:18 +0100
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio-ccw: update documentation

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:17:08 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 01/15/2018 11:43 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > The vfio-ccw documentation comes from the cover letter of the
> > original patch submission, which shows in some parts. Give it some
> > love; in particular:
> > 
> > - Remove/rework statements that make sense in a cover letter, but not
> >   in regular documentation.
> > - Fix some typos.
> > - Describe the current limitations in more detail.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>  
> 
> The changes look sane and definitively improve on what we have
> right now. Acked by me if you like.

Can you please give your explicit A-b on v2?

> 
> When we are at the limitations, the prefetch story seems to be
> still missing. IMHO it's the most important limitation.

Yeah, that's just a start. I'm happy to take further patches :)