[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180117231357.GC112833@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:14:19 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Dunn <mikedunn@...sguy.com>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] drivers: pwm: core: use a single of xlate
function
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:24:59AM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Please explain me further. From this I understand, as a general rule,
> that the device tree binaries from, e.g. 3 years ago, should be
> compatible with, e.g. the current version of kernel?
Yes.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists